DMEPOS Fee Schedule - 2014 April Update Medicare/Noridian

DMEPOS Fee Schedule - 2014 April Update

MLN Matters® Number: MM8645
Related Change Request (CR) #: CR 8645
Related CR Release Date: March 11, 2014
Effective Date: April 1, 2014
Related CR Transmittal #: R2902CP
Implementation: April 7, 2014

Provider Types Affected
This MLN Matters® Article is intended for physicians, providers, and suppliers submitting claims to Part A/B Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs), Hospice and Home Health (HHHMACs), and Durable Medical Equipment MACs (DME MACs) for DMEPOS items or services paid under the DMEPOS fee schedule.

Provider Action Needed 
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued Change Request (CR) 8645 that alerts providers and suppliers that CMS issued instructions updating the DMEPOS fee schedule payment amounts. Be sure your billing personnel are aware of these changes.

Background 
CMS updates DMEPOS fee schedules on a quarterly basis, when necessary, in order to implement fee schedule amounts for new and existing codes, as applicable, and apply changes in payment policies. The quarterly update process for the DMEPOS fee schedule is located in the "Medicare Claims Processing Manual", Chapter 23, Section 60, which is available at http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/clm104c23.pdf  on the CMS website.

Key Points of CR8645

Splints, Casts and Certain Intraocular Lenses (IOLs) 
The following are the HCPCS codes for splints, casts, and certain IOLs added to the DMEPOS fee schedule file:

• A4565, Q4001, Q4002, Q4003, Q4004, Q4005, Q4006, Q4007, Q4008, Q4009, Q4010, Q4011, Q4012, Q4013, Q4014, Q4015, Q4016, Q4017, Q4018, Q4019, Q4020, Q4021, Q4022, Q4023, Q4024, Q4025, Q4026, Q4027, Q4028, Q4029, Q4030, Q4031, Q4032, Q4033, Q4034, Q4035, Q4036, Q4037, Q4038, Q4039, Q4040, Q4041, Q4042, Q4043, Q4044, Q4045, Q4046, Q4047, Q4048, Q4049, V2630, V2631, V2632.

As written in the MLN Matters® Article MM8523 (Change to the Reasonable Charge Update for 2014 for Splints, Casts, and Certain Intraocular Lenses) at http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM8523.pdf , for dates of service on or after April 1, 2014, payment for splints, casts and IOLs inserted in a physician's office will be made using national fee schedule amounts.
For splints and casts, codes A4565 and Q4001-Q4049 are used when supplies are indicated for cast and splint purposes and:

• Payment is in addition to the payment made under the physician fee schedule for the procedure for applying the splint or cast. Per the regulations at 42 CFR Section 414.106, national fee schedule amounts for 2014 for these items were developed using 2013 reasonable charges updated by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June 2013, which is 1.8 percent; and 
• For each year subsequent to 2014, the fee schedule amounts will be updated by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the preceding year, reduced by the productivity adjustment as described in Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II) of the Social Security Act.

For intraocular lenses (codes V2630, V2631 and V2632), payment under the DMEPOS fee schedule is only made for lenses implanted in a physician's office:

• For payment of IOLs inserted in a physician's office furnished from April 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014, regulations at 42 CFR Section 414.108 require national fee schedules be established based on the Calendar Year (CY) 2012 national average allowed charges updated by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 24-month period ending with June 2013, which is 3.5 percent;
• For each year subsequent to 2014, the fee schedule amounts will be updated by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for all urban consumers (United States city average) for the 12-month period ending with June of the preceding year, adjusted by the productivity adjustment as described in Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(xi)(II) of the Act; and 
• For IOL codes V2630 and V2631, national fee schedules amounts have been established using the fee schedule amounts for comparable code V2632 since there is insufficient allowed charge data for use in calculating the fee schedule amounts.

Subject to coinsurance and deductible rules, Medicare payment for these items is to be equal to the lower of the actual charge for the item or the amount determined under the applicable fee schedule payment methodology.
Payment Category Reclassification of Certain DME  
Effective for dates of service on or after April 1, 2014, certain HCPCS codes for DME are reclassified from the payment category for inexpensive or other routinely purchased DME to the payment category for capped rental items, to align with the regulatory definition of routinely purchased equipment found at 42 CFR Section 414.220(a)(2).
These changes were determined through rulemaking (CMS-1526-F) and as written in the MLN Matters® Article MM8566 titled Rescind/Replace Reclassification of Certain Durable Medical Equipment from the Inexpensive and Routinely Purchased Payment Category to the Capped Rental Payment Category, available at http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM8566.pdf  on the CMS website.
As part of the April 2014 update to the DMEPOS fee schedule, the methodology used to calculate fee schedule amounts for capped rental items has been used to establish new fee schedule amounts for the following HCPCS codes:

• A4639, A7025, E0117, E0144, E0198, E0300, E0620, E0656, E0657, E0740, E0762, E0764, E0849, E0855, E0856, E0984, E0986, E1002, E1003, E1004, E1005, E1006, E1007, E1008, E1010, E1014, E1029, E1030, E1161, E1232, E1233, E1234, E1235, E1236, E1237, E1238, E1700, E2227, E2310, E2311, E2312, E2313, E2321, E2322, E2325, E2326, E2327, E2328, E2329, E2330, E2351, E2373, E2374, E2376, E2377, E2378, E2500, E2502, E2504, E2506, E2508, E2510, K0607, K0730.

Consistent with the capped rental payment methodology, only Rental Amounts (RR) will appear on the fee schedule file for the above codes, effective April 1, 2014, and:

• The HCPCS codes transitioning to the capped rental payment category with corresponding KC, KF or KE modifiers will continue to have rental amounts associated with these modifiers on the fee schedule file;
• The capped rental fee schedule amount is calculated based on ten percent of the base year purchase price increased by the covered item update; 
• This is the fee schedule amount for rental months one through three. Beginning with the fourth month, the fee schedule amount is equal to 75 percent of the fee schedule amount paid in each of the first three rental months; and
• All of the payment rules for capped rental items, including guidelines regarding continuous use and transfer of title to the beneficiary following 13 months of continuous use, apply to these codes, effective for claims with dates of service on or after April 1, 2014.

Also effective April 1, 2014, MACs will process and pay claims for capped rental wheelchair accessories on a lump sum purchase basis when used with complex rehabilitative power wheelchairs (wheelchair base codes K0835 – K0864). In this case, the supplier must give the beneficiary the option of purchasing these accessories at the time they are furnished. The purchase fee schedule amount for capped rental accessories furnished in this manner is equal to the rental fee (for months one through three) multiplied by ten. If the beneficiary declines the purchase option, the supplier must furnish the accessory on a rental basis and payment will be made in accordance with the capped rental payment rules.
Specific Coding and Pricing Issues
As part of this update, effective April 1, 2014, HCPCS code L8680 is not included on the 2014 DMEPOS fee schedule file and the coverage indicator is revised to "I" to show it is not payable by Medicare. Note that:

• For neurostimulator devices, HCPCS code L8680 is no longer separately billable for Medicare because payment for electrodes has been incorporated in CPT code 63650 Percutaneous implantation of neurostimulator electrode array, epidural. 
• CMS established non-facility practice expense inputs for CPT code 63650 in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule (published November 27, 2013). As a result, practitioners should not report electrode(s) using code L8680 in conjunction with a lead implantation procedure furnished in any setting for Medicare.  
• Also, this change for code L8680 will be available on the HCPCS Quarterly Update website at http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/HCPCSReleaseCodeSets/HCPCS_Quarterly_Update.html  on the CMS website.

Additional Information
The official instruction, CR8645, issued to your MAC regarding this change is available at http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/Downloads/R2902CP.pdf  on the CMS website.

Last Updated Mar 14, 2014

Physicians Should Prepare Now for Medicare Cuts

By David Doyle from Physicians Practice

Roughly 27 percent of Americans on Medicare are enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. Federal funding for this Medicare alternative has already been cut by 6.5 percent this year, and additional cuts are planned. Preliminary 2015 rates for Medicare Advantage will be announced in February and finalized in April.

Hospitals are responding to existing and upcoming Medicare cuts by trimming staff. Lawrence + Memorial Hospital in New London, Conn., reduced its workforce by 33 positions in September 2013. In its press release, the hospital specifically blamed a predicted “$260 billion reduction in Medicare outlays between 2013 and 2022.” Other hospitals are also cutting staff and will continue to do so if Medicare cuts become too cumbersome — bad news for the thousands of doctors who recently sold their practices to healthcare systems.

Cuts to Medicare reimbursement rates and Medicare Advantage are impacting private practices as well. Last November the nation’s largest provider of Medicare Advantage Plans, UnitedHealth Group, sent termination letters to physicians in 10 states. According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, these letters cited “significant changes and pressures in the health care environment.” UnitedHealth Group hopes to trim the program to between 85 and 90 percent of its current size by the end of 2014.

These sudden, drastic cuts threaten patient care and will even force many patients to stop visiting specific physicians midtreatment. However, some practices are fighting back. Judge Stefan R. Underhill, the United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, issued a temporary injunction in December that prohibits UnitedHealth Group’s planned dismissals in Fairfield and Hartford Counties. Another lawsuit in the state of New York is still pending. The American Medical Association even weighed in when it recently joined with 30 medical associations and physician advocacy groups to oppose “wide-spread terminations in the Medicare Advantage program.”

Additional debates over the future of Medicare cuts will likely ensue over the next few months, but what can practices do in the meantime?

As cuts to Medicare and Medicare Advantage reimbursement rates go into effect, practices that serve Medicare patients must ensure that it’s still profitable for them to do so.

Begin by calculating the amount of time a physician can spend with a Medicare patient before the practice loses money. Next, consult your patient records from the last three months to determine whether physicians are exceeding this mark. If the practice loses money every time it sees a Medicare patient, you must set a strict time limit for physician consultations and monitor any changes over the next three months. If at the end of this time you discover that treating Medicare patients is still a net loss for the practice, then it might be time to reconsider your patient base.

Practices that are removed from Medicare Advantage networks will also need to adjust. If your practice is one of these, and you haven’t already done so, you must inform your affected patients as soon as possible. According to The Washington Post, many patients don’t understand that these terminations were not their physicians’ fault. Help your patients by either referring them to physicians within their network whom you trust, or recommending alternative Medicare Advantage networks that your practice still belongs to.

Taking precautionary measure now will help protect your practice’s long-term viability and reputation without leaving your patients out in the cold.

Courtesy of Physicians Practice http://www.physicianspractice.com/blog/physicians-should-prepare-now-medicare-cuts?GUID=2E8F906E-CDE7-43B7-AC93-7066F83372C7&rememberme=1&ts=11022014

Health Insurance Exchange Problems Hit Patients, Practices Hard

By P.j. Cloud-moulds from Physicians Practice

Wow, what a week!  What a year, I should say.  The state of California has seen many, many changes since January 1. How these changes are affecting physicians and practices is mind-boggling.

Here are a few of the biggest changes practices are experiencing: 1. A new California law allows patients to walk into a physical therapy office without a prior prescription and receive treatment for a specific number of visits or days.  The problem is that some insurance companies still require a prescription from a licensed physician.  Unfortunately, insurance companies often don't share this information at the verification level with the physical therapist, and the claim is denied or delayed in payment.  This has been a treat to figure out, but most of the patients have primary-care physicians that the physical therapist can fax the evaluation to, and this seems to satisfy the insurance companies need for a prescription. 2. The next change relates to the California workers compensation fee schedule.  It transitioned from very specific 30-minute timed codes to the Medicare Fee Schedule.  The problem is that very few of the workers compensation plans actually implemented this change and they are pulling the, “We didn't know” card.  Senate leaders in Sacramento have filed complaints against many of these plans. Liberty Mutual, your time to pay up has come!  I strongly advise practices to review their workers compensation claims with their healthcare and billing staff to make sure they are using the updated fee schedule, that the workers compensation plans are paying per the fee schedule, and that someone is following up with these types of claims. 3. Our latest fiasco has been my favorite so far:  Covered California. It really should be called Uncovered California.  This blog article is certainly not long enough to list all of the fiascos that we uncovered this week, but let me name a few.  Blue Shield created a “narrowed network" and many physicians that participate with Blue Shield are not in network on the new exchange plans. That means that if a patient purchases a Blue Shield exchange plan and calls for an appointment and a practice's front-office staff mistakenly believes it is in network, the patient may have to pay out-of-network rates around a 50 percent coinsurance for receiving services at your practice.   I have identified a common group number of X001004 and alpha prefixes of XEA, XEC, XED, XEK followed by 900.  These two are tip-offs that the patient is on exchange, off exchange, or underwritten.  All of these scenarios claims are processing out of network.Some of the health cards have the “Covered California” logo on them, some don't.  All of the plans indicate that they are some sort of PPO, so practices usually don't think twice about not being in network.  Patients are angry and up in arms about all of this.  While trying to figure this all out, I came across the Blue Shield Facebook page. If you want a laugh, take a look.  The company's canned responses are similar to the recorded messages and disclaimers you get when you call.  Blue Cross of California also has several new plans in which many providers are considered out of network.  Practices in the state of California may want to spend a few hours to identify patients with the alpha prefix JQD, JQM, JQN and VXB with corresponding group numbers of 0RX, 0RY (zero not “O”).  It is imperative that practices discuss these out-of-network issues with their staff so that they are aware when patients call and start yelling about getting their bills.

Article From Physicians Practice  http://www.physicianspractice.com/blog/health-insurance-exchange-problems-hit-patients-practices-hard?GUID=2E8F906E-CDE7-43B7-AC93-7066F83372C7&rememberme=1&ts=18022014

Participating in New Healthcare Exchange Plans

By Susanne Madden from Physicians Practice

It is early with regard to the healthcare exchange plans and yet practices across the country are already feeling the impact. It's not just consumers who have experienced problems while attempting to sign up for the exchange plans on the healthcare.gov website; providers too are dealing with major headaches as they navigate through the first couple of months of this new system.

Let me explain. The insurance companies created something called "narrow networks" within their full network of providers. What that means is that only a subset of physicians within any given insurance company's network "qualified" for participation in the exchange plans. The result is that while some physicians got rolled into these plans, others were excluded, even though they participate in some of the other products with that particular insurance company. For example, a physician could be participating with an HMO and a PPO-type product, but be excluded from the exchange product. This has created a dilemma for many practices. On the one hand, it means no new business coming in from new exchange members. On the other hand, it also means scrambling to hold onto existing patients that have switched to these new, lower-priced health insurance products.

The physicians that were rolled in (or opted in, in many cases) to the new exchange networks are struggling to determine new patients' eligibility under these plans. Many patients have not yet received insurance cards, and those that have are sometimes finding that their physician was mistakenly listed on the website as a "participating" provider.

In addition, those physicians who are participating with the exchange plans are finding that they are getting paid less for doing more. That is, not only are the rates less in these plans, but many patients who previously did not have health insurance may have gone without care for prolonged periods of time. As a result, they are typically sicker than patients who have been under care over time.

Also, signing up for participation in these plans means accepting a lower payment rate because the insurance companies are offering these as "budget" plans with low premiums. Naturally, the discounts have to come from somewhere and this is in the form of lower payments to physicians who participate with these plans.

So where does that leave things for physicians?

Here are four points to consider:

1. Physicians need to know whether they are participating with an exchange plan.

This can usually be readily discovered by looking yourself up on an insurance company's online directory. But don't just trust the data that you find there; double-check by calling the insurance company and verify that you are in fact participating with an exchange plan (there have been many errors on these sites so far).

2. Physicians need to determine what their fee schedule is going to be.

Ask the insurance plan to send you a sample for your specialty or send them your highest utilized codes for pricing.

3. Physicians need to communicate very clearly with patients if they are not in the exchange plans.

Hang posters on your waiting-room walls and get communications out to patients to explain that the insurance company (if this is the case) has decided to exclude you from the exchange product. Many patients wrongly assume that their physician is automatically in the network, so do your best to educate them as soon as possible.

4. Physicians need to quantify the damage.

Take note of the number of patients that you may lose due to their choice of plan and appeal to the insurance company to see if there is a way that you can retain them. If you purposefully opted out of the exchange network then it is unlikely that you can hold onto these patients. But if you were excluded from the network, you may be able to appeal ― in doing so the plan might make an exception and add you in.

If you are participating with an exchange product and you find that you are receiving an influx of these patients, my best advice to you is to set up some very good patient education materials and tools around the most frequently seen chronic conditions, in order to help manage what may be a sicker population of patients. Don't be afraid to look at what the insurance company is offering in terms of chronic-care support. Many have teams of nurses that help to manage the patient's care and do a relatively good job of feeding that information back to the primary-care physician.

Lastly, remember that it is still early. There are going to be a lot of missteps under this new system, on all sides. So I suggest hanging in there to see how things shake out. Like any new program it will take a while to work out the kinks.

Article by: Susanne Madden, MBA, is founder and CEO of The Verden Group, a consulting and business intelligence firm that specializes in practice management, physician education, and healthcare policy. She is also COO, National Breastfeeding Center, and cofounder, Patient Centered Solutions. She can be reached at madden@theverdengroup.com or by visiting www.theverdengroup.com.

From Physicains Practice http://www.physicianspractice.com/healthcare-reform/participating-new-healthcare-exchange-plans?GUID=2E8F906E-CDE7-43B7-AC93-7066F83372C7&rememberme=1&ts=27022014

Getting Paid for Value: Defining New Reimbursement Models

As payment for physicians' services continues its steady decline, practices across the country are exploring new ways to thrive. For pediatrician Jesse Hackell's five-physician practice, part of the solution was joining a large multi-specialty pediatric group.

"We found that payments were not keeping pace with inflation and hadn’t been for many, many years, and that was becoming an untenable situation," says Hackell, whose practice is located in Pomona, N.Y. "What joining a large group enabled us to do was finally level the playing field a little bit in negotiating with the insurance companies. It gave us some strength by virtue of our numbers."
But while partnering up might provide some practices with negotiating leverage, it may only be a temporary solution to a more permanent problem. The results of Physicians Practice's 2013 Fee Schedule Survey indicate that the downward reimbursement trend continues. Between 2012 and 2013, average commercial payer reimbursement for all new and established office visits fell nearly 9 percent. That's on top of a 10 percent decline that occurred between 2011 and 2012. (More in-depth survey data is available in the accompanying survey results and online at PhysiciansPractice.com.)

Editor's note: The results of our annual Fee Schedule Survey are in. See where your practice stacks up when it comes to payment for top codes.

Eventually, even negotiating higher rates with payers won't get practices very far.  But it's not all bad news. As fee-for-service declines, more payers are exploring value-based reimbursement models, in which practices receive higher pay if they provide high-quality, low-cost care. And while many physicians are hesitant to embrace such models — only 16 percent of our fee schedule survey respondents said the shift in payment methodology would be good for their practices — experts say a proactive approach is the best course. "The world's changing and the market's changing, and I think that all too often physicians like it the way it was, and it’s not going to be like that," says John Lutz, managing director at Huron Healthcare, a healthcare consulting firm based in Chicago. "I think that the sooner people start looking forward instead of looking in the rearview mirror, we'll be better off."  But finding the best path forward is not easy, and the broad array of emerging value-based payment models and incentives makes it even more difficult. Here's a closer look at some of the most prevalent value-based models and incentives, and what the experts say your practice can do to get involved.

Pay-for-performance incentives

Getting paid for value does not mean your practice needs to jump headfirst into a full-fledged value-based payment model, such as an accountable care organization (ACO) or a bundled payment arrangement. Many payers are offering smaller-scale value-based incentives, such as pay-for-performance incentives, to practices that reach quality and/or cost targets.  Though pay-for-performance incentives are nothing new, the bonus targets set forth by payers are becoming "much more sophisticated" as the shift toward value gains momentum, says Randy Cook, president and CEO of consulting firm AmpliPHY Physician Services.
For example, in the past, a practice may have received a bonus if it prescribed generic medication to a certain percentage of its patients. Now, a practice may receive a bonus if a certain percentage of its diabetic patients have their A1C levels under control. "That's what's called an outcome measure," says Cook, who is based in Columbia, Tenn. "[You] have to accomplish a whole lot of other things in order to create that outcome."

By Aubrey Westgate from Physicians Practice http://www.physicianspractice.com/fee-schedule-survey/getting-paid-value-defining-new-reimbursement-models?GUID=2E8F906E-CDE7-43B7-AC93-7066F83372C7&rememberme=1&ts=31012014

2014 Medicare Physicians Fee Schedule (MPFS) Available Soon

2014 MPFS Available Soon Watch for the 2014 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS). It will be published on the “Fee Schedules” webpage at med.noridianmedicare.com/web/jeb/fees-news/fee-schedules after its regulation is put on display.
Last Updated Nov 27, 2013

Physicians Dropped by Health Plans for Overutilization

By Averel B. Snyder, MD from Physicians Practice

After United Healthcare dropped 15 percent of its provider panel, I was not surprised. I actually thought something like that would occur sooner. It is clear that for Medicare to survive and to decrease healthcare costs in this country, healthcare delivery needs to change. Most believe that fee-for-service reimbursement is no longer an option and there seems to be a shift toward pay for performance. Clearly, increasing quality, decreasing costs, and increasing patient satisfaction are goals both payer and provider would strive for.

There are certain services in place to help meet these goals. One such example is the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV). The AWV, by delivering evidence-based preventive services, helps keep patients healthier and prevents over-utilization of services. The visit also helps satisfy quality measures for PQRS reporting. Despite all these advantages only approximately 12 percent of Medicare beneficiaries have had their AWV.

Another way to increase quality and decrease costs is to identify those patients that are at increased risk of overutilization. The current methodology to identify risk is the CMS HCC method. In addition to identifying risk by assigning a risk score to each patient, the codes are necessary for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to get paid from CMS. The majority of physicians do an incomplete job of coding, making it necessary for MA plans to use third-party providers for risk assessments and retrospective chart reviews. There are now automated software solutions that provide all the components of the AWV and calculate the CMS HCC risk score real time.

The point is that fee-for-service overutilization, no coding, and not providing quality measures will not be and should not be tolerated. Those plans with strong executive leadership will identify those top 15 percent physician over-utilizers and not allow them to participate in the MA plan. If I was one of those executives I would make the same decision. It is time to make the paradigm shift and provide the highest quality care as cost efficiently as possible. It is to the providers' advantage to provide wellness visits for all their Medicare patients, and to understand the nuances of HCC coding.

Article By Averel B. Snyder, MD from Physicians Practice

http://www.physicianspractice.com/blog/physicians-dropped-health-plans-overutilization?GUID=2E8F906E-CDE7-43B7-AC93-7066F83372C7&rememberme=1&ts=19112013

2013-2014 Influenza (Flu) Resources for Health Care Professionals

MLN Matters® Number: SE1336
Provider Types Affected

This MLN Matters® Special Edition article is intended for all health care professionals who order, refer, or provide flu vaccines and vaccine administration to Medicare beneficiaries.
What You Need to Know

Keep this Special Edition MLN Matters® article and refer to it throughout the 2013 - 2014 flu season.

Take advantage of each office visit as an opportunity to encourage your patients to protect themselves from the flu and serious complications by getting a flu shot.
Continue to provide the flu shot as long as you have vaccine available, even after the new year.
Don't forget to immunize yourself and your staff.

Introduction

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reminds health care professionals that Medicare Part B reimburses health care providers for flu vaccines and their administration. (Medicare provides coverage of the flu vaccine without any out-of-pocket costs to the Medicare patient. No deductible or copayment/coinsurance applies.)

You can help your Medicare patients reduce their risk for contracting seasonal flu and serious complications by using every office visit as an opportunity to recommend they take advantage of
Medicare's coverage of the annual flu shot.

As a reminder, please help prevent the spread of flu by immunizing yourself and your staff!

Know What to Do About the Flu!

Educational Products for Health Care Professionals
The Medicare Learning Network® (MLN) has developed a variety of educational resources to help you understand Medicare guidelines for seasonal flu vaccines and their administration.

1. MLN Influenza Related Products for Health Care Professionals

• MLN Matters® Article MM8433: Influenza Vaccine Payment Allowances – Annual Update for 2013-2014 Season – http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/MM8433.pdf
• Quick Reference Information: Medicare Part B Immunization Billing chart - http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/qr_immun_bill.pdf
• Quick Reference Information: Preventive Services chart - http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/Downloads/MPS_QuickReferenceChart_1.pdf
• Preventive Immunizations booklet – http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/Preventive-Immunizations-ICN907787.pdf
• MLN Preventive Services Educational Products Web Page  - http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/PreventiveServices.html
• Preventive Services Educational Products PDF – http://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/education_products_prevserv.pdf

2. Other CMS Resources

• Seasonal Influenza Vaccines 2013 Pricing - http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Part-B-Drugs/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice/2013ASPFiles.html
• Immunizations web page is located at http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/Immunizations/index.html
• Prevention General Information is located at http://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prevention/PrevntionGenInfo/index.html
• CMS Frequently Asked Questions - http://questions.cms.gov/faq.php  
• Medicare Benefit Policy Manual - Chapter 15, Section 50.4.4.2 – Immunizations - http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/bp102c15.pdf   
• Medicare Claims Processing Manual – Chapter 18, Preventive and Screening Services http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Manuals/downloads/clm104c18.pdf

3. Other Resources

The following non-CMS resources are just a few of the many available where you may find useful information and tools for the 2013 – 2014 flu season:

• Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices -  http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/index.html  
• Flu Clinic Locator - http://www.flucliniclocator.org
• Other sites with helpful information include:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - http://www.cdc.gov/flu;
  • Flu.gov - http://www.flu.gov; 
  • Food and Drug Administration - http://www.fda.gov;
  • Immunization Action Coalition - http://www.immunize.org;  
  • Indian Health Services -  http://www.ihs.gov/;  
  • National Alliance for Hispanic Health - http://www.hispanichealth.org;  
  • National Foundation For Infectious Diseases - http://www.nfid.org/influenza;
  • National Library of Medicine and NIH Medline Plus - http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/immunization.html;
  • National Network for Immunization Information - http:/www.immunizationinfo.org;
  • National Vaccine Program - http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo;
  • Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion - http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov;   
  • Partnership for Prevention - http://www.prevent.org; and
  • World Health Organization - http://www.who.int/en

Beneficiary Information
For information to share with your Medicare patients, please visit http://www.medicare.gov on the Internet.

Medicare Jurisdiction E Part B Updates

Payment Rules Notice

Although we are still assessing the impact of the partial government shutdown on completion of the calendar year 2014 Medicare fee for service payment regulations, we intend to issue the final rules on or before November 27, 2013, generally to be effective on January 1, 2014. The impacted regulations include:

• Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, Quality Incentive Program, and Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics, and Supplies (CMS-1526-F)
• CY 2014 Changes to the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment System (CMS-1601-FC)
• CY 2014 Home Health Prospective Payment System Final Rule (CMS-1450-F)
• Revisions to Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014 Final Rule with Comment Period (CMS-1600-FC)

Source: LEARNRESOURCE-L E-mail Update, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services dated October 23, 2013